[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Peter T. Breuer wrote:

> > How does the other user's of this device "know" that there is
> > a new file so it can update its notion of the block-device state?
> The block device itself is stateless at the block level. Every block
> access goes "direct to the metal".
> The question is how much FS state is cached on either kernel.
> If it is too much, then I will ask how I can cause to be less, perhaps
> by use of a flag that parallels how O_DIRECT works. I thought that new
> files were entries in a directories inode and I agree that inodes are
> held in memory! But I don't know when they are first read or reread.

And neither can you know. After all, this is filesystem dependant.

You cannot decide whether filesystem-independant clustering is
possible unless you know that all the filesystems play by your
rules. So much for filesystem-independance.


"You're one of those condescending OLS attendants"
"Here's a nickle kid. Go buy yourself a real t-shirt"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.099 / U:20.848 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site