[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] mount flag "direct"
On 2002-09-03T17:44:10,
"Peter T. Breuer" <> said:

> No! I do not want /A/ fs, but /any/ fs, and I want to add the vfs
> support necessary :-).
> That's really what my question is driving at. I see that I need to
> make VFS ops communicate "tag requests" to the block layer, in
> order to implement locking. Now you and Rik have pointed out one
> operation that needs locking. My next question is obviously: can you
> point me more or less precisely at this operation in the VFS layer?
> I've only started studying it and I am relatively unfamiliar with it.

Your approach is not feasible.

Distributed filesystems have a lot of subtle pitfalls - locking, cache
coherency, journal replay to name a few - which you can hardly solve at the
VFS layer.

Good reading would be any sort of entry literature on clustering, I would
recommend "In search of clusters" and many of the whitepapers Google will turn
up for you, as well as the OpenGFS source.

Lars Marowsky-Brée <>

Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me.
--- Gregory F. Pfister

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.090 / U:3.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site