Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:05:48 +0200 (CEST) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19 |
| |
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> > (allowing -10 might be too much of a stretch.) > > Why? If it's using more than 50% CPU, the prio will be the same as a > zero-niced interactive process.
well, perhaps -10 could also be allowed.
does -10 make it equivalent to the 2.4 behavior? Could you somehow measure the priority where it's still acceptable? Ie. -8 or -9?
> The minimum user nice value might be a good candidate for a new > rlimit...
yes.
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |