lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    Date
    From
    Subject[UPATCH] force_sig_info()
    Hello.

    This is my third attempt:

    On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
    > 2.5.34 introduced this change in force_sig_info()
    >
    > - return send_sig_info(sig, info, t);
    > + return send_sig_info(sig, (void *)1, t);
    >
    > I beleive, it is wrong, info can carry useful information
    > from do_page_fault, traps. And this (info *)1 does not
    > prevent send_signal() from allocation of siginfo struct.
    > Ingo, could you please clarify?

    Call me stupid, but i still believe it is bug.

    --- linux-2.5.39/kernel/signal.c~ Sun Sep 29 16:37:08 2002
    +++ linux-2.5.39/kernel/signal.c Sun Sep 29 16:37:35 2002
    @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@
    recalc_sigpending_tsk(t);
    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sigmask_lock, flags);

    - return send_sig_info(sig, (void *)1, t);
    + return send_sig_info(sig, info, t);
    }

    static int
    Oleg.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.018 / U:31.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site