lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results
Date
On 24 September 2002 07:26, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Quoting Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>:
> > On 24 September 2002 01:01, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > (And if there's more than a 1% variation between same kernel, compiled
> > > with different compilers then the test is bust. Kernel CPU time is
> > > dominated by cache misses and runtime is dominated by IO wait.
> > > Quality of code generation is of tiny significance)
> >
> > Well, not exactly. If it is true that Intel/MS compilers beat GCC
> > by 30% on code size, 30% smaller kernel ought to make some difference.
> >
> > However, that will become a GCC code quality benchmark then.
>
> Great well if someone has access to one of these compilers and can
> successfully compile me a kernel using my .config I'd love to benchmark it
> for them.

No, they can't compile kernel, it's too GCC-centric.
Worse, they're not open source.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.798 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site