[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes
   From: David Mosberger <>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:19:02 -0700

This looks like a porting-nightmare in the making. There's got to be a
better way to determine whether you need a writeq() vs. a writel().

Or perhaps every platform should provide a writeq(), on 32-bit systems
it may merely be implemented as two consequetive writel() calls.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.124 / U:6.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site