lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK

On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> Nevertheless the current get_pid is very bad when the tasklist grows and
> the pid space is reduced, [...]

> It may not be the best for a 1million pid case, but certainly it is a
> must have for 2.4 and I think it could be ok for 2.5 too. It is been
> submitted for 2.5 a number of times, I quote below the 2.4 version just
> so you know what I'm talking about exactly [...]

Andrea, the new PID allocator (and new pidhash) went into 2.5.37, there's
no get_pid() anymore. Do we agree that the runtime-bitmap hack^H^H^H^patch
is now moot for 2.5?

Ingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans