lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Adeos nanokernel for 2.5.38 1/2: no-arch code

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Why this ifdef hell and not something like:
>
> lockbuf_lock();
> bla
> logbuf_unlock();
>
> and have this defined in a header, say printk.h or whatever, with the
> ifdefs?

You're right, this is somewhat insane ;)

We'll fix it, thanks.

Karim

===================================================
Karim Yaghmour
karim@opersys.com
Embedded and Real-Time Linux Expert
===================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.879 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site