lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.5.36-mm1 dbench 512 profiles
    Date
    On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 05:48:38 +0530, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

    > Hanna Linder wrote:
    >>> Looks like fastwalk might not behave so well on this 32 cpu numa
    >>> system...
    >
    > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:38:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >> I've rather lost the plot. Have any of the dcache speedup patches been
    >> merged into 2.5?
    >
    > As far as the dcache goes, I'll stick to observing and reporting. I'll
    > rerun with dcache patches applied, though.
    >
    ..
    > Thanks,
    > Bill
    > -

    For a 32-way system fastwalk will perform badly from dcache_lock point of
    view, basically due to increased lock hold time. dcache_rcu-12 should reduce
    dcache_lock contention and hold time. The patch uses RCU infrastructer patch and
    read_barrier_depends patch. The patches are available in Read-Copy-Update
    section on lse site at

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/lse

    Regards
    Maneesh

    --
    Maneesh Soni
    IBM Linux Technology Center,
    IBM India Software Lab, Bangalore.
    Phone: +91-80-5044999 email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
    http://lse.sourceforge.net/
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.048 / U:0.876 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site