Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:41:38 +0100 | From | Neil Booth <> | Subject | Re: FW: 2.5.34: IR __FUNCTION__ breakage |
| |
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:-
> > > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you > > > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99 > > > varargs macros... > > > > I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again. > > if I remember corretly with C99 if you do s.th. like this (simple > sample): > > #define LOG(level, format, ...) \ > log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);
No, this is only valid C99 if __VA_ARGS__ is the empty list.
I posted the correct way to write this macro about a week ago that works with all versions of GCC (and follows their documented behaviour; this stuff *is* all documented).
Neil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |