Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] BUG(): sched.c: Line 944 | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 18 Sep 2002 00:44:51 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 16:58, Steven Cole wrote:
> Sorry, it hung so badly that it didn't respond to that.
I fixed the hang. If you notice the problem, please do not laugh.
The attached patch, against 2.5.36, should work fine...
Robert Love
diff -urN linux-2.5.36/kernel/sched.c linux/kernel/sched.c --- linux-2.5.36/kernel/sched.c Tue Sep 17 20:58:48 2002 +++ linux/kernel/sched.c Wed Sep 18 00:41:09 2002 @@ -940,9 +940,6 @@ struct list_head *queue; int idx; - if (unlikely(in_atomic())) - BUG(); - #if CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM check_highmem_ptes(); #endif @@ -950,8 +947,20 @@ preempt_disable(); prev = current; rq = this_rq(); - release_kernel_lock(prev); + + /* + * Test if we are atomic. Since do_exit() needs to call into + * schedule() atomically, we ignore that for now. Otherwise, + * whine if we are scheduling when we should not be. + */ + if (likely(current->state != TASK_ZOMBIE)) { + if (unlikely((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 1)) { + printk(KERN_ERR "scheduling while non-atomic!\n"); + dump_stack(); + } + } + prev->sleep_timestamp = jiffies; spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |