[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectInfo: NAPI performance at "low" loads
NAPI network drivers mask the rx interrupts in their interrupt handler,
and reenable them in dev->poll(). In the worst case, that happens for
every packet. I've tried to measure the overhead of that operation.

The cpu time needed to recieve 50k packets/sec:

without NAPI: 53.7 %
with NAPI: 59.9 %

50k packets/sec is the limit for NAPI, at higher packet rates the forced
mitigation kicks in and every interrupt recieves more than one packet.

The cpu time was measured by busy-looping in user space, the numbers
should be accurate to less than 1 %.
Summary: with my setup, the overhead is around 11 %.

Could someone try to reproduce my results?

# sendpkt <target ip> 1 <10..50, go get a good packet rate>

$ loadtest

Please disable any interrupt mitigation features of your nic, otherwise
the mitigation will dramatically change the needed cpu time.
The sender sends ICMP echo reply packets, evenly spaced by
"memset(,,n*512)" between the syscalls.
The cpu load was measured with a user space app that calls
"memset(,,16384)" in a tight loop, and reports the number of loops per

I've used a patched tulip driver, the current NAPI driver contains a
loop that severely slows down the nic under such loads.

The patch and my test apps are at

hardware setup:
Duron 700, VIA KT 133
no IO APIC, i.e. slow 8259 XT PIC.
Accton tulip clone, ADMtek comet.
crossover cable
Sender: Celeron 1.13 GHz, rtl8139


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.109 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site