lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: do_gettimeofday vs. rdtsc in the scheduler
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:32:46PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> Date: 17 Sep 2002 16:32:15 -0700
>
> Additionally, where is this system tick thing? You make it sound like
> its a register in the cpu, and while the Ultra-III may have one, I'm
> unaware of a system/bus tick register on intel chips. Is it in some
> semi-documented MSR?
>
> It's in a register on Ultra-III. The whole point of this
> conversation, if you read my initial postings, is that
> "this should have been specified in the x86 architecture"
>
> I know full well it isn't currently :-)

Sorry, it's wrong. The x86 architecture has several such registers
(apic timers, 8253 timer, HPET [Microsoft requires this for new
hardware that will be w*s certified])
They just all suck on various systems or in general. HPET is ok,
but still not widespread enough.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.044 / U:42.132 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site