[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: dbench on tmpfs OOM's
Hi Hugh,

On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> What I never did was try GFP_HIGHUSER and kmap on the index pages:
> I think I decided back then that it wasn't likely to be needed
> (sparsely filled file indexes are a rarer case than sparsely filled
> pagetables, once the stupidity is fixed; and small files don't use
> index pages at all). But Bill's testing may well prove me wrong.

I think that this would be a good improvement. Big database and
application servers would definitely benefit from it, desktops could
easier use tmpfs as temporary file systems.

I never dared to do it with my limited time since I feared deadlock

Also I ended up that I would try to go one step further: Make the
index pages swappable, i.e. make the directory nodes normal tmpfs
files. This would even make the accounting right.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.066 / U:3.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site