Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:19:14 +1000 | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: System response benchmarks in performance patches |
| |
Hi Bill
Quoting Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > > I came up with a very simple way of measuring responsiveness that gives > me > > numbers that are meaningful to me. What I've done is the old faithful > kernel > > compile and measured it under different loads to simulate the pc's ability > to > > perform under various loads. I have so far benchmarked 2.4.19 versus > 2.4.19-ck7, > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap and 2.4.18-6mdk(mandrake's kernel in 8.2). 2.5.34 has a > dead > > keyboard for me so I'm unable to test it as yet. > > If that's a real kernel compile in <2 minutes I'm impressed!
If you look at my README in the tarball you'll see that I suggest using a minimal kernel config (ie almost nothing enabled) and include just such a .config. So, yes, it is a real kernel compile on a 1133Mhz pIII.
Con. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |