lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: System response benchmarks in performance patches
    Hi Bill

    Quoting Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>:

    > On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:
    >
    > >
    > > I came up with a very simple way of measuring responsiveness that gives
    > me
    > > numbers that are meaningful to me. What I've done is the old faithful
    > kernel
    > > compile and measured it under different loads to simulate the pc's ability
    > to
    > > perform under various loads. I have so far benchmarked 2.4.19 versus
    > 2.4.19-ck7,
    > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap and 2.4.18-6mdk(mandrake's kernel in 8.2). 2.5.34 has a
    > dead
    > > keyboard for me so I'm unable to test it as yet.
    >
    > If that's a real kernel compile in <2 minutes I'm impressed!

    If you look at my README in the tarball you'll see that I suggest using a
    minimal kernel config (ie almost nothing enabled) and include just such a
    .config. So, yes, it is a real kernel compile on a 1133Mhz pIII.

    Con.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.022 / U:147.724 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site