[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] BUG(): sched.c: Line 944
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 19:45, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Ahhah! I know. You just make lock_depth 0 when you exit, without actually
> taking the kernel lock. Which fools the logic into accepting a
> preempt-disable, since it thinks that the preempt disable is due to
> holding the kernel lock.

I was this -> <- close to celebrating. Not so fast, smarty.

What about release_kernel_lock() ?

It sees task->lock_depth>=0 and calls spin_unlock() on a lock that it
does not hold.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:1.367 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site