This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Mon Jan 30 10:07:33 2023 Received: from spaans.ds9a.nl (adsl-xs4all.ds9a.nl [213.84.159.51]) by kylie.puddingonline.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8INnsX21896 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 01:49:54 +0200 Received: (qmail 31822 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2002 09:06:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO spaans.ds9a.nl) (3ffe:8280:10:360:202:44ff:fe2a:a1dd) by mayo.ipv6.ds9a.nl with SMTP; 18 Sep 2002 09:06:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 13270 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Sep 2002 21:54:30 -0000 Received: (maildatabase); juh Received: (qmail 7857 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2002 19:15:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 7854 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2002 19:15:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dipsaus.ds9a.tudelft.nl) (3ffe:8280:10:360:2a0:cff:fe14:9dde) by mayo.ipv6.ds9a.nl with SMTP; 16 Sep 2002 19:15:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 29954 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2002 19:15:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vger.kernel.org) (::ffff:209.116.70.75) by adsl-xs4all.ds9a.nl with SMTP; 16 Sep 2002 19:15:05 -0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:08:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:08:06 -0400 Received: from smtp-outbound.cwctv.net ([213.104.18.10]:29487 "EHLO smtp.cwctv.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:08:04 -0400 Received: from cwctv.net ([172.16.33.41]) by smtp.cwctv.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44); Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:11:46 +0100 From: To: phillips@arcor.de, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, zippel@linux-m68k.org, lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk, viro@math.psu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:11:52 +0100 Subject: RE:Understanding the Principles of Argumentation #3 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Liberate TVMail 2.6 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1032203512559" Message-Id: <0bbd34611191092DTVMAIL3@smtp.cwctv.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=6.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: Lines: 81 --1032203512559 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rusty doesn't like people quoting him in signatures, but that ones a definate possibility... Cheers, Dean McEwan. Currently hacking KGI, which I don't understand, oh and ask me about OpenModemTalk... On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:36:42 +0200 Daniel Phillips wrote: --1032203512559 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.116.70.75]) by smtp.cwctv.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44); Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:40:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:32:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:32:20 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-040-192.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.40.192]:65415 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:32:19 -0400 Received: from daniel by starship with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17qyrb-0000Jv-00; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:36:43 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Rusty Russell , Roman Zippel Subject: Understanding the Principles of Argumentation #3 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:36:42 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Jamie Lokier , Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020916120022.22FFC2C12A@lists.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20020916120022.22FFC2C12A@lists.samba.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: linux-kernel-owner+Hell.Surfers=40cwctv.net@vger.kernel.org This is the third in my "Understanding the Principles of Argumentation" series. Rusty has obligingly provided us with a fine example of an "ad hominem attack": On Monday 16 September 2002 04:17, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Don't forget that the Unix way has traditionally been to use the > > simplest interface that will do the job; if you propose a fat > > interface you need to prove that the thin one cannot do the job. > > Gee, really? You're so clever! > > You patronising little shit, An ad hominem attack is a logical fallacy where the arguer attacks the person, rather than the issue: http://home.mcn.net/~montanabw/fallacies.html -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ --1032203512559-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/