[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.4.20pre5aa2
On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 09:39:24AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 16:18, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > So, returning to xfs, it is possible dbench really generates lots of
> > simultaneous vmaps because of its concurrency, so I would suggest to add
> > an atomic counter increased at every vmap/vmalloc and decreased at every
> > vfree and to check it after every increase storing the max value in a
> > sysctl, to see what's the max concurrency you reach with the vmaps. (you
> > can also export the counter via the sysctl, to verify for no memleaks
> > after unmounting xfs)
> >
> > Andrea
> There are no vmaps during normal operation on xfs unless you are
> setting extended attributes of more than 4K in size, or you
> used some more obscure mkfs options. Only filesystem recovery will
> use it otherwise.

Perhaps the original poster used those obscure mkfs options? What option
will trigger huge allocations ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.098 / U:1.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site