[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.34-bk fcntl lockup
On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 12:18:11PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> please apply this.

agreed, please apply.

> Fixes endless loop without schedule which happens as soon as smbd
> invokes fcntl64(7, F_SETLK64, ...). fcntl_setlk64 gets cmd F_SETLK64,
> not F_SETLK tested in the loop;

i guess the LTP testsuite isn't quite comprehensive enough yet, it should
have caught this.

> Maybe return value from posix_lock_file should be changed to -EINPROGRESS
> or -EJUKEBOX instead of testing passed cmd in callers, but this oneliner
> works too. If you preffer changing posix_lock_file return value to clearly
> distinugish between -EAGAIN and lock request queued, I'll do that.

i'll look at that idea, hadn't occurred to me before.

Revolutions do not require corporate support.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.600 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site