[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5 port of aio-20020619 for raw devices
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 12:34:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It has the disadvantage that we may have some data which is mergeable,
> and would in fact nonblockingly fit into a "congested" queue. Don't
> know if that makes a lot of difference in practice.

That's what I was thinking. Not having a congested queue really breaks
aio as your submit point is not supposed to incur significant latency: an
io should -EAGAIN if it would cost a large delay to setup.

"You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.056 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site