lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: System response benchmarks in performance patches
On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:

> I came up with a very simple way of measuring responsiveness that gives
> me numbers that are meaningful to me. What I've done is the old faithful
> kernel compile and measured it under different loads to simulate the
> pc's ability to perform under various loads.

Absolutely wonderful. I'd love to see this easily scriptable
so we can just run it with one command, eg:

$ ./contest

> Kernel Time %CPU
> 2.4.19 3:00.76 58%
> 2.4.19-ck7 2:01.68 86%
> 2.4.19-ck7-rmap 2:05.95 83%
> 2.4.18-6mdk 3:01.48 58%

Very interesting results. People benchmarking just one thing
at a time won't get variances anywhere near this big, while
real system workload is pretty much always multitasking.

I think I've finally found a benchmark that gives results which
are meaningful in the context of a multitasking system.

regards,

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.055 / U:2.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site