Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:47:45 -0400 (EDT) | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: XFS? |
| |
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >No, that's probably a good thing. I don't care how good any programming > >team might be, an implementation written from scratch probably should burn > >in for a while before going in anywhere it might be used for production. > > > >And with all respect to the group, a 4th rewite from scratch in only a few > >years suggests that the ratio of coding to designing is pretty high.
> As for the notion that the more designing you do, the less rewriting you > need to do, it is a bit like the belief that the better your scientific > theories the less you need to perform experiments.
Exactly so. I spent several decades doing software development at GE's Corporate R&D Center, and I had ample proof that both of those things are true. I think the phrase you want in English is "fewer experiments you need to perform," but you did see the principle.
> Projects that are no longer attempting rewrites of their cores are dead > in their soul, and their authors should pass them on to someone younger.
Hear that, Linus? Off to the retirement home with you unless you "rm *" your source tree and "go back to Baltimore and start over again as a virgin." Actually I think that Linux is an example of major software designed from the start to be rewritten in parts and to evolve as a whole. no clean sheet of paper needed.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |