lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.19 OOPS [Repost]
Hm, actually I am.

And from the oops traces, the offending intruction always seems to be a
pop.

I'll upgrade and try again.

Thanks,
Sapan

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:48:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 18:16, lists@corewars.org wrote:
> > Just in case this might shed some more light on the problem...
> > I recompiled the kernel with frame pointers about a week ago, and I
> > didn't face a single oops till today morning, when I recompiled the
> > kernel without frame-pointers and I've been getting the same
> > oopses all day.
> >
>
> Are you using gcc 3.0.x or an early gcc 3.1.x. There are bugs in those
> where they write below the stack pointer which means an IRQ will corrupt
> stuff. Turning on frame pointers might well hide this
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.061 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site