[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3
Urban Widmark wrote:
> ...
> If I understood Andrew right with the inode flag that won't purge anything
> until the next userspace access. I don't think that is what smbfs wants
> since the response to the oplock break should happen fairly soon ...

Well the lazy invalidation would be OK - defer that to the next
userspace access, or just let the pages die a natural VM death,
maybe poke `ksmbinvalidated'.

But if you want to perform writeback within the local IO daemon
then hm. That's a problem which NFS seems to not have? I guess
you'd have to leave i_sem held and poke `ksmbwritebackd'. Or teach
pdflush about queued work items (a tq_struct would do it).

But it's the same story: the requirements of

a) non blocking local IO daemon and

b) assured pagecache takedown

are conflicting. You need at least one more thread, and locking
against userspace activity.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.109 / U:2.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site