Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:42:01 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.19 SCSI core bug? |
| |
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:39:23AM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote: > I have a cleanup patch for 2.5 scsi_error I will add this fix in. > scsi_send_eh_cmnd should not be retrying the command it should return to > the caller the status and let them decide. We also should create a > ?restore_scsi_cb? function that is shared so that it is done > consistently.
I've got a patch for both of these now. I'm working through some other issues at the moment though (like, why the hell requests for sectors after the sector in error don't have a data phase, and the drive returns status = GOOD, message = COMMAND COMPLETE, leading the kernel to believe that it did transfer data.)
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |