Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 12 Sep 2002 15:11:23 +0100 |
| |
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 14:57, Todd Underwood wrote: > thanks. although i'd love to take credit, i don't think that the > reverse-order fragmentation appreciation is all that original: who > wouldn't want their data sctructure size determined up-front? :-) (not to > mention getting header-overwriting for-free as part of the single copy.
As far as I am aware it was original when Linux first did it (and we broke cisco pix, some boot proms, some sco in the process). Credit goes to Arnt Gulbrandsen probably better known nowdays for his work on Qt
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |