[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.5 Problem Status Report
On Wed, Sep 11 2002, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:38:25AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > I have preemption disabled.
> > nevertheless please print out preempt_count() in sched.c - since the big
> > IRQ cleanups we use the preemption count even if preemption is disabled.
> > this way we'll know what kind of problem happened - a stuck softirq count,
> > a stuck hardirq count or an underflow?
> You was exactly right. preemption count is -1. I inserted chack in
> dec_preempt_count() and here is updated correct stacktrace. Seems
> like ide_unmap_buffer is called with some bogus data or something like
> that. Also I guess the bug is only visible with debug highmem = ON and
> highmem enabled.

ok I see the bug. it's due to the imbalanced nature of ide_map_buffer()
vs ide_unmap_buffer(). i'll cook up a fix right away.

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.129 / U:1.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site