lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000


> > Load "Mode"
> > -------------------
> > Lo 1) RxIntDelay=0
> > Mid 2) RxIntDelay=fix (When we had X pkts on the RX ring)
> > Hi 3) Consecutive polling. No RX interrupts.

Manfred Spraul writes:

> Sounds good.
>
> The difficult part is when to go from Lo to Mid. Unfortunately my tulip
> card is braindead (LC82C168), but I'll try to find something usable for
> benchmarking

21143 for tulip's. Well any NIC with "RxIntDelay" should do.

> In my tests with the winbond card, I've switched at a fixed packet rate:
>
> < 2000 packets/sec: no delay
> > 2000 packets/sec: poll rx at 0.5 ms

I was experimenting with all sorts of moving averages but never got a good
correlation with bursty network traffic as this level of resolution. The
only measure I found fast and simple enough for this was the number of
packets on the RX ring as I mentioned.


Cheers.
--ro
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.112 / U:1.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site