[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Raceless module interface

    > Now there's the question "if this is such a great approach, why not make
    > all modules work this way, not just filesystems?". Easy: the magic
    > scheduling approach impacts the scheduler, however lightly, and worse,
    > we cannot put an upper bound on the time needed for

    You are in principle describing RCU. These guys seem to have solved the

    > magic_wait_for_quiescence to complete. So the try_count approach is
    > preferable, where it works.

    But the try_count approach hurts every user of the defined interfaces,
    even if modules are not used. Is the impact on the scheduler limited
    to the time magic_wait_for_quiescence is running.
    If so, the approach looks superior.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.020 / U:42.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site