lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Raceless module interface
Date
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 23:26, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Really, that's not so, there are limits. 30 seconds? Whatever.
> > Remember, during this time the service provided by the module is
> > unavailable, so this is denial-of-service land. You could of
> > course put in extra code to abort the unload process on demand,
> > but, hmm, it probably wouldn't work ;-)
>
> If you're going to do it right, you should fix that denial-of-service by
> waiting until the module has finished unloading and then demand-loading
> the module again.

That doesn't make the DoS go away, it just makes it a little
harder to trigger. Anyway, one thing we could do if the rest
of the module mechanism is up to it, is know that somebody is
trying to reactivate a module that has just returned from
module_cleanup(), and immediately reactivate it instead of
freeing it, hoping to save some disk activity - if this turns
out to be a real problem, that is. The null solution is likely
the winner here.

> Ideally, those periodic "rmmod -a" calls should _never_ cause a
> denial-of-service.

Goodness no. By the way, nobody has asked me how rmmod -a is
to be implemented. Oh well.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.149 / U:0.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site