lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: XFS?
    At 04:20 PM 9/9/2002 -0500, Shawn wrote:
    >XFS needs a sponser. Who amung Linus's circle of trust cares to comment
    >or re-evaluate?
    >
    >If no one, I guess it's a moot point.

    (see below)

    >On 09/09, Andi Kleen said something like:
    > > Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org> writes:
    > >
    > > > Hi,
    > > >
    > > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, khromy wrote:
    > > > > What's up with XFS in linux-2.5? I've seen some patches sent to the
    > list
    > > > > but I havn't seen any replies from linus.. What needs to be done to
    > > > > finally merge it?
    > > >
    > > > It has been stated quite regularly that XFS
    > > > a) doesn't always work like it should yet
    > >
    > > That's quite bogus. While not being perfect XFS just works fine for lots
    > > of people in production and performs very well for a lot of tasks.
    > >
    > > > b) involves some changes which Linus doesn't like in particular, for
    > > > pretty good reasons.
    > >
    > > I think that's FUD too. That last patch had 6 lines or so of changes
    > > to generic code, everything else was already merged.

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    -Mike

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.025 / U:121.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site