Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:46:16 +0200 | From | Rogier Wolff <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RFC] per isr in_progress markers |
| |
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:53:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > (Btw, if there is, that would also allow us to notice the "constantly > screaming PCI interrupt" without help from the low-level isrs)
OH! That'd be nice: instead of a lockup if a PCI device's interrupt isn't serviced, you get a nice message and a machine that might still work!
On the other hand, you have a possibility for disaster if the threshold isn't set right.
I have written serial drivers where the card will limit the interrupt rate to max 100 per second. I then build in a detection: if my IRQ handler gets called more than 10 times in a jiffy, we're in trouble.
Turns out that I left this in "in the field" and some people put the serial card on the same interrupt line as a SCSI controller. The scsi controller can generate more than 1000 interrupts per second -> my driver shuts down....
Something similar may happen if say you net-spray a sligtly under-powered machine with a Gigabit ethernet card: The GBE card may indeed have a new packet ready by the time the interrupt tries to return. Leads to an interesting DOS: just send a bunch of packets in quick succession and the machine drops off the internet...
Roger.
-- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * The Worlds Ecosystem is a stable system. Stable systems may experience * * excursions from the stable situation. We are currenly in such an * * excursion: The stable situation does not include humans. *************** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |