Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 01 Sep 2002 05:16:11 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] warnkill trivia 2/2 | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 14:10:53 +0200
> Let's keep the sparc atomic_read() how it is so more bugs > like this can be found. I don't know, though... scratching my head here -- Is GCC actually able to distinguish between 'const int *a' and 'int const *a'? No I don't mean this in a "C" sense, I mean conceptually that marking an object const which has members which are volatile and updated asynchronously makes zero sense. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |