[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Are we looking at the same thing? The cpu load there is dominated by
> cpu_idle, 89%. Anyway, if your point is that it makes sense to run
> shrink_cache or refill_inactive in parallel, I don't see it because
> they'll serialize on the lru lock anyway. What would make sense is to
> make shink_cache nonblocking.

Working on it ;)

Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.098 / U:1.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site