lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: question on spinlocks
Date
Am Montag, 2. September 2002 00:09 schrieb Thunder from the hill:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > No; spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore and
> > > > spin_lock/spin_unlock have to be used in matching pairs.
> > >
> > > If it was his least problem! He'll run straight into a "schedule
> > > w/IRQs disabled" bug.
> >
> > OK, how do I drop an irqsave spinlock if I don't have flags?
>
> IMHO you might even ask "How do I start a car when I don't have the
> keys?"

Break off the lock, touch some cables ... ;-)

> You might find a way, but it's not desired. Are you sure you want to
> reschedule in an interrupt handler? If it's none, are you sure you want
> to disable interrupts?

I am not in an interrupt handler. It's not my fault that the scsi layer
calls queuecommand with a spinlock held. But I need to sleep,
I have to get rid of that spinlock's effects. If possible I even want
interrupts to be enabled.

Regards
Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.057 / U:9.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site