Messages in this thread |  | | From | Dieter Nützel <> | Subject | Re: Benchmarks for performance patches (-ck) for 2.4.19 | Date | Mon, 2 Sep 2002 05:24:41 +0200 |
| |
Hello Con,
I have your ck5_2.4.19.patch with some additional stuff running fine on my dual Athlon MP 1900+, MSI K7D Master-L, 1 GB DDR-SDRAM 266 CL.
ck5 + some 2.4.19-jam0 stuff (Andrea, Ingo, others)
000_e100-2.1.6 (-AA) 000_e1000-4.3.2 (-AA) 00_387-fix-1 10-module-size-checks 12-memparam 24-config-nr_cpus 30-smptimers-A0 30_irq-balance-12 31-nr_requests 70-i2c-2.6.4 71-sensors-2.6.4
2.4.19.pending ReiserFS stuff linux-2.4.19-ntfs-2.1.0a.patch page_color-2.4.19-pre10-1 (Page coloring)
I'm from Robert Love's "side" and have his stuff running on top of 2.4 for nearly one year, now.
The first bench I try is latencytest-0.42-png all the time. http://www.gardena.net/benno/linux/audio/
Then I try dbench (Yes, I know Rik ;-) to see the GREAT speed of Andrea Arcangeli's -AA VM which improve noticeably with the Preemption patch. O(1) gave some additional speed, too.
What about Robert's nice Preemption Latency Measurement Tool? http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux
I tried it many times to gave Robert some feedback.
Regards and good work!
-Dieter
-- Dieter Nützel Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel at hamburg.de (replace at with @)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |