[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30
Uz.ytkownik Jesse Barnes napisa?:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:21:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>macro worked before? I could just remove all those checks in the scsi
>>>code I guess.
>>That would be a better option.
> Ok.
>>The MUST_NOT_HOLD basically means the kernel will OOPS the
>>moment the lock is contended.

And for Gods sake ;-) - please call it ASSERT_ and not MUST_THIS
MUST_THAT MUST_GO_TO_TOILET. For the nonanglosaxons among us the
personifications already frequently enough present in english
nomenclature sound already awfoul enough... Additionally gerp -i assert
will work as expected, since MUST is a far more frequent term.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.152 / U:3.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site