lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:00:45AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:

> > For MUST_NOT_HOLD to work, you need to take into account which processor
> > took the lock etc.

[snip]

> Agreed. I'll post another patch that doesn't mess with the scsi
> stuff. Maybe later I can put together a useful
> 'lock-not-held-on-this-cpu' macro.

You don't need to put this in a macro. This test is valid
for ALL spinlocks in the kernel and can be done from inside
the spin_lock() macro itself, when spinlock debugging is on.

regards,

Rik
--
http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2002/
"You're one of those condescending OLS attendants"
"Here's a nickle kid. Go buy yourself a real t-shirt"

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.121 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site