lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: softirq parameters
    Date
    In message <20020807.112424.60322440.davem@redhat.com> you write:
    > From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
    > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:35:04 +0100
    >
    > Hrm, I didn't realise what the implementation of percpu was... does it
    > work for modules?
    >
    > Good question, I bet it doesn't based upon how I understand
    > it to work.

    Yes, it doesn't work for modules. The IBM guys have a kmalloc_percpu
    thing which will, but I'm not trying to change the world.

    This is one reason for changing to DECLARE_PER_CPU and DEFINE_PER_CPU
    macros (the other is because RTH wants to use __thread for per-cpu
    variables).

    Rusty.
    --
    Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.021 / U:93.700 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site