Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 06 Aug 2002 10:23:19 -0700 | From | george anzinger <> | Subject | Re: Thread group exit |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 09:58, Zeuner, Axel wrote: > > I would expect, that changes of the parent of one member of the thread group > > do not affect the interactions between the members of the group. > > Corrections are welcome. > > (Please cc mails to me, I read only the archives of the > > linux-kernel list.) > > I agree with your diagnosis I'm not convinced by your change. The thread > groups are only used by NGPT not by glibc pthreads while the problem is > true across both.
Have the glibc folks decided NOT to move to thread groups? I sort of expected that they were just taking their time, but would eventually move.
-g > > Possibly the right fix is to remove the reparent to init increment of > self_exec_id and instead explicitly check process 1 in the signal paths. > > Opinions ? > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |