[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 2.5.31] transparent PCI-to-PCI bridges

On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> I disagree. There was a very good reason for doing that - you can build
> PCI bus tree (up to 256 buses) _only_ with PCI-to-PCI bridges

Your logic is so flawed that it's scary.

Your logic is "I _can_ do it this way, thus everybody else must do it this
way". Where the _hell_ is the logic there?

I pointed out a _fact_: there are PCI bridges that bridge more than 3
resources. Argue with that until you turn blue in the face, I don't care.
I'm not talking about theory, I'm talking about bridges that I _have_ in
my machines, and that may have been set up by the firmware.

The fact that you could have built hardware and firmware that didn't have
more than three resources is _immaterial_, since it has nothing to do with
the realities of today.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.071 / U:3.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site