[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] scheduler fixes, 2.5.32-BK

> - changes the migration code to use struct completion. Andrew pointed out
> that there might be a small window in where the up() touches the
> semaphore while the waiting task goes on and frees its stack. And
> completion is more suited for this kind of stuff anyway.

actually, i think the race does not exist. up() is perfectly safely done
on the on-stack semaphore, because both the wake_up() done by __up() and
the __down() path takes the waitqueue spinlock, so i cannot see where the
up() touches the semaphore after the down()-ed task has been woken up.

the second argument still holds though - a completion is probably slightly
cheaper in this case.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.060 / U:1.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site