Messages in this thread |  | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] list.h update (resent again) | Date | Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:42:20 +1000 |
| |
In message <20020829105324.A13720@lst.de> you write: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:03:58PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Don't apply it (at least, the first part is bad). > > > > Linus, here's my patch to get rid of the usurper list_t in 2.5 > > (against 2.5.32, so might have some rejects). > > U don't think that's a valid reason to delay it. Ingo added list_t > for a reason und 2.4 is not the right place to change struct list_head > to struct list, which sounds good for 2.5.
Ingo's reason was that it made some of his lines fit in 80 cols 8)
Having two names for the same thing is a confusing waste, and "struct list_head" is the defacto standard. If you have nothing better to do, I can suggest plenty of worthwhile projects which could use your skills 8)
Die typedefs, die, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |