[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: page-flags.h pollution?
David Mosberger wrote:
> In the 2.5.3x kernel, what's the point of defining pte_chain_lock()
> and pte_chain_unlock() in page-flags.h? These two routines make it
> impossible to include page-flags.h on it's own, because they require
> "struct page" to be defined (and a forward declaration isn't
> sufficient either). This can introduce rather annoying circular
> include-file dependencies.

It's a wart. The now-abandoned hashed spinlocking patch moves
them into <linux/rmap-locking.h>. We can do that anyway - only
two files need it.

Or maybe just put them in asm-generic/rmap.h. I'll fix it up.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.027 / U:1.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site