Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:34:08 +0200 | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) |
| |
At 01:14 PM 8/29/2002 +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >hi all > >David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than >2.4.19 anyways' > >is this correct?
(flips coin)
No.
(Now, who are you going to believe.. grep is your friend;)
-Mike
>---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > >Subject: e1000/2.4 >Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT) >From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> >To: roy@karlsbakk.net > >If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000 >driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the >2.4.x tree > >2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-) > >------------------------------------------------------- > >-- >Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester >ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/ >Tel: +47 9801 3356 > >Computers are like air conditioners. >They stop working when you open Windows. > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |