lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4)
At 01:14 PM 8/29/2002 +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>hi all
>
>David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than
>2.4.19 anyways'
>
>is this correct?

(flips coin)

No.

(Now, who are you going to believe.. grep is your friend;)

-Mike


>---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>
>Subject: e1000/2.4
>Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
>To: roy@karlsbakk.net
>
>If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000
>driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the
>2.4.x tree
>
>2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-)
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>
>--
>Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
>ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
>Tel: +47 9801 3356
>
>Computers are like air conditioners.
>They stop working when you open Windows.
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.039 / U:6.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site