lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Rmap speedup
    On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:

    > No joy, I'm afraid.

    > Guess we should instrument it up and make sure that the hashing
    > and index thing is getting the right locality.

    Could it be that your quad needs to go to RAM to grab a cacheline
    that's exclusive on the other CPU while Daniel's machine can just
    shove cachelines from CPU to CPU ?

    What I'm referring to is the fact that the pte_chain_locks in
    Daniel's patch are all packed into a few cachelines, instead of
    having each lock on its own cache line...

    This could explain the fact that the locking overhead plummeted
    on Daniel's box while it didn't change at all on your machine.

    regards,

    Rik
    --
    Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

    http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:4.455 / U:0.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site