[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4)
hi all

David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than
2.4.19 anyways'

is this correct?

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

Subject: e1000/2.4
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David S. Miller" <>

If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000
driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the
2.4.x tree

2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-)


Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
ProntoTV AS -
Tel: +47 9801 3356

Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.061 / U:3.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site