lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4)
Date
hi all

David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than
2.4.19 anyways'

is this correct?

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

Subject: e1000/2.4
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: roy@karlsbakk.net

If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000
driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the
2.4.x tree

2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-)

-------------------------------------------------------

--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
Tel: +47 9801 3356

Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.028 / U:4.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site