lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] misc. kernel preemption bits

On 29 Aug 2002, Robert Love wrote:
>
> - we have a debug check in preempt_schedule that, even
> on detecting a schedule with irqs disabled, still goes
> ahead and reschedules. We should return. (me)

I think we should return silently, and simply consider the case of
disabled local interrupts to be equivalent to having preemption disabled.

So I would remove even the warning.

Comments?

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.033 / U:1.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site