lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] misc. kernel preemption bits

    On 29 Aug 2002, Robert Love wrote:
    >
    > - we have a debug check in preempt_schedule that, even
    > on detecting a schedule with irqs disabled, still goes
    > ahead and reschedules. We should return. (me)

    I think we should return silently, and simply consider the case of
    disabled local interrupts to be equivalent to having preemption disabled.

    So I would remove even the warning.

    Comments?

    Linus

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:4.172 / U:1.272 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site