lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched.c
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:35:49 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
> But these are not performance-critical functions. And by far the
> most inefficient part of them is that they're reading data for
> CPUs which cannot exist. That can be fixed with a `cpu_possible(i)'
> test in there, but Rusty was going to give us a `for_each_cpu' macro.
> We haven't seen that yet.

I have it, but Linus isn't taking the prerequeisite, which changes cpu masks
to generic bitmaps.

Due to be retransmitted in the next couple of days,
Rusty.
--
there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.054 / U:4.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site