lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched.c
    On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:35:49 -0700
    Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
    > But these are not performance-critical functions. And by far the
    > most inefficient part of them is that they're reading data for
    > CPUs which cannot exist. That can be fixed with a `cpu_possible(i)'
    > test in there, but Rusty was going to give us a `for_each_cpu' macro.
    > We haven't seen that yet.

    I have it, but Linus isn't taking the prerequeisite, which changes cpu masks
    to generic bitmaps.

    Due to be retransmitted in the next couple of days,
    Rusty.
    --
    there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
    many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:3.314 / U:0.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site