Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:47:12 +1000 | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched.c |
| |
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:35:49 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote: > But these are not performance-critical functions. And by far the > most inefficient part of them is that they're reading data for > CPUs which cannot exist. That can be fixed with a `cpu_possible(i)' > test in there, but Rusty was going to give us a `for_each_cpu' macro. > We haven't seen that yet.
I have it, but Linus isn't taking the prerequeisite, which changes cpu masks to generic bitmaps.
Due to be retransmitted in the next couple of days, Rusty. -- there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |