[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] SImple Topology API v0.3 (1/2)

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Because NUMA is subordinate to X86, and another technology named NUMA
> > might appear? Nano-uplinked micro-array... No Ugliness Munched Archive?
> > Whatever...
> NUMA means non-uniform memory access. At least IBM, AMD and SGI do
> NUMA; and I guess anyone with 100+ nodes *has* numa machine. (BUt as
> andrea already explained, CONFIG_NUMA is already taken for generic
> NUMA support.)

I'm aware of that. You didn't get my point, though. I was just suggesting
that there might be other things called NUMA, so CONFIG_X86_NUMA may be
just right.

--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.051 / U:3.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site